 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 2008
by Michael Ledeen
by Michael Ledeen
by Michael Ledeen Michael Ledeen takes a fresh look at Tocqueville’s insights into our national psyche and asks whether Americans’ national character, which Tocqueville believed to be wholly admirable, has fallen into moral decay and religious indifference. by Michael Ledeen American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Ledeen offers an updated version of the rules for leadership laid down by Machiavelli. Its the nature of humans to do evil, and war is our natural state. Anyone who would wield power in such a setting, writes Ledeen, echoing Machiavelli, “must be prepared to fight at all times.” This is as true in business, sports, and politics as it is on the battlefield.
by Michael Ledeen With the skill of a born storyteller, Michael Ledeen weaves together key moments in the fall of communism. His insider’s knowledge of the interplay of complex personalities and Byzantine strategies makes a compelling narrative, one enlivened by his wry wit and flair for the dramatic. In this call to embrace the worldwide democratic revolution, the author argues that global democracy should be the centerpiece of U.S. strategy. |
March 27, 2008 5:32 PM
Khamenei is Shooting Craps...The Shi’ites are killing one another all over Iraq, most notably in Basra. Jules Crittendon, as always, has a fine roundup of the (mis)coverage from the MSM, delivers all the right insults (I particularly enjoyed watching the back of his hand slap the unctious Tony Cordesman) and asks all the right questions. What kicked this off? Who’s fighting whom? Who’s gonna win? Is it good for us or bad for us? The best way to understand these events is to take one little step back, and note that our people are being rocketed in Baghdad, and that the rockets are made and delivered by the mullahs. Likewise, the Mahdi Army groups in the south get lots of Iranian arms, money and other assistance, as do the terrorists now cornered in and around Mosul. Coalition forces have found large caches of weapons (RPGs, mortars, land mines, advanced IEDs) of recent Iranian manufacture all over Iraq in recent days, suggesting, to me at least, that Iran is throwing its dice in a desperate effort to reverse the strategic catastrophe in Iraq. In other words, the mullahs know they are losing. Their great dream of driving America out of Iraq, which seemed to be about be fulfilled just a year and a half ago, has now turned into the nightmare of humiliation and defeat for the Islamic Republic. And now–again as Jules stresses–the Maliki Government is attacking the remnants of the Mahdi Army in Basra, that same government the mullahs thought they had under control. A lot of the coverage revolves around the colorful figure of Moqtada al Sadr, as if he were calling some of the shots in Baghdad and Basra, but those stories are anachronistic. Mookie is no longer a major player in these events. The mullahs gave up on him several months ago, split his “army” of thugs into many pieces, and command the warlords who lead them. So, while some of the killers in Basra are what we would call common criminals, the more or less organized Mahdi crowd are carrying out Tehran’s design. Let’s take another step backward. At the outset of the war, Khamenei and his ilk fully expected to gain the support of most Iraqi Shi’ites, and to create little regional islamic republics, starting in Basra. They spent an enormous amount of money, buying local properties, opening stores and offices (I heard of one with a sign on the door: “Iranian Military Intelligence”), bribing local officials and businessmen. Today, on the most reliable accounts, most Iraqi Shi’ites (and Sunnis, for that matter) despise the Iranian regime, blame it for most of the violence, and are fighting Iranians and their proxies throughout the land. When Ahmadi-Nezhad came to Baghdad, the country’s spiritual leader, Ayatollah Sistani, declined to meet him, even as thousands of Iraqis demonstrated in the streets against Iran. Sistani could probably have shut down the demonstrations… Then there is the question of Maliki and his government, in which Iran has invested so many resources. As some clever person once said, you can’t really buy anyone in the Middle East, at best you can rent him for a while. Any Iraqi leader must take out insurance with Tehran, because the mullahs can kill a lot of people in Iraq. But al Qaeda is now on the verge of extinction there, and there is a bottom-up war against the militias from Sunni and Shi’ite alike. Democracy works its magic, even in the Middle East, and Maliki wants to keep his job. Right now, that requires him to fight the Iranian-sponsored militias. There must be a lot of teeth gnashing in Tehran these days, and lots of colorful curses aimed at Baghdad. So Iran is hoping to make its pass, but the roll of the dice in Basra looks more like snake eyes coming up. Read the accounts by Nibras Kazimi, who, unlike the journalists in bureaux in Washington, New York and Baghdad, talks directly to many people on the ground, and, again unlike the MSM reporters, actually knows what Basra looks like. And please pay no account to Gareth Porter, accurately described by Jules as a water carrier for the mullahs. If the Iraqi Government wins this, there will be consequences all around. First, it will curl the toes of the mullahs, because of all the possible outcomes in Iraq, the worst for them is a duly elected government that can fight effectively. Second, as Nibras says, it will greatly solidify Maliki’s position in Baghdad. Third, it will send a double message throughout the region: it isn’t easy to defeat America, and countries that work with America can defeat even the fiercest enemy. Of course, the militias may win, or Maliki may be pressured to call off the assault before victory is achieved, or accidents may happen that produce an unhappy outcome. But for the moment, at least, things look promising. And it just shows you, once again, that we live in a fundamentally unpredictable world. Who would have expected this, even a few weeks ago? UPDATE: Thanks to Free Republic for posting this. Comments (4)j green :M.E. :Your analysis may appear as too optimistic but it’s absolutely correct for objective reasons: political, historical and psychological. The events can be “unpredictable” but they have always logic. ML: Thanks for the kind and wise words. WDP :Excellent analysis, Mr. Ledeen. I have a small point with your analogy, however. In craps, once you have established your point, it really doesn't matter how many times you roll snake eyes (or 'two'). The only losing roll would be a seven. However, snake eyes will lose on your first, or 'come out' roll. Otherwise, a great article. Thank you for writing it. Kourosh :Patient is a virtue. Khomeinists have demonstrated, they are more patient than Nancy Pelosi and her kind, when it come to Iraq and overall terrorist strategies. There is a big difference between mentality of Khomeinist Terrorist and American when in comes to Iraq. Khomeinists have their hands on everything and support every terrorist organization conducting attacks against US and her friends, US on the other hand conduct the war in Iraq through the lenses of reporters and mostly European media. That is not a winning strategy, is it? Khomenists poke at US as long as they can, and when they see their are being defeated they stop, temporarily. Then again they come back and do the same thing again, until media forces American to withdraw of any effective plan. In the case of Sader terrorist, everybody knows they are being train and supply by Mullahs, but no one go after them to finish the job. Then when Makliki decides to do something about it, Mullahs forces Moghtada terrorists to withdraw temporarily, and come back later. No gun is handed to Iraqi police as Maliki said they must. Here is the latest example of Khomeinist strategy and its results. You be the judge: Source: "...Mahmoud Othman, an Iraqi parliament member and a Kurd, said what happened "is another victory for Iran," which he says has "the upper hand" in Iraq. Speaking from London, England, Othman said Iran has created problems by fostering close relations with Shiite groups, including the Mehdi Army and the government. When Iran realized the situation was getting out of hand -- threatening a wider war and America's participation in it -- it got involved in the recent talks to stop the violence. "They make problems," Othman said. "Then they end it the way they like." Ali al-Dabbagh, an Iraqi government spokesman, Monday complimented the lawmakers for their efforts to end the violence, but he said the government itself wasn't involved in the effort. But Othman said the government was clearly involved, with al-Maliki sending a delegation to Qom in Iran."... ML: Well, the mullahs just got kicked in their private parts, and their proxies suffered big casualties, hundreds dead and nearly a thousand wounded. Iraqi troops are now going door to door. If that's grand strategy, I'll take Yogi Berra... Comments have been archived for this page. |
Pajamas MediaBig Fat Brother Is Watching Your Calorie Count Obamessiah Hits the Holy Land Hurricane Dolly Slows, Deepens, About to Hit Texas Shocked Serbians Celebrate Karadzic’s Capture The Dark Knight — Not Just Another Superhero Movie Colorblind Equality: A Winning Issue for McCain? The Media and Obama: Reporters or Flunkies? John Edwards in a Feydeau Farce at the Beverly Hilton
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
RSS FeedsADVERTISEMENT
|
digg this
del.icio.us
I have a feeling the Iranian regime is in the midst of some kind of retooling as well. I say this because I think that the sanctions may be effecting them some, the economy back home is even more terrible, and people grow more bold than ever.
Whether they can recover from the blows they are receiving with the long-overdue rise of Iraqi democratic will (and of course the surge)--let's hope not. The in-fighting has started.
Mar 28, 2008 01:16 AM